Photo: Katrin
Batereau
Installing
a PASSCAL seismo-acoustic station at Karymsky Volcano, August, 1997.
Jeff Johnson, a student from the University of Washington is connecting
a 3 component Guralp 40T. The experiment included infra-sonic accoustic
recordings of the explosion events that occured every 5-15 minutes
on average.
|
New PASSCAL data have
been acquired along the extent of the Kamchatka Peninsula to examine the
interaction of the Pacific Plate and the mantle in the corner junction
of the Aleutian and Kamchatka trenches. The project, called the Side Edge
of Kamchatka Slab, is a collaborative effort between researchers at Yale
University and the Russian Academy of Sciences Institutes in Petropavlovsk-Kamchatski,
in particular the Institute of Volcanology (Alexey Ozerov) and KOMSP (Evgenii
Gordeev). In Russia, Kamchatka is known as the caboose, the last car on
the train. It is practically the farthest one can get from Moscow, the
center of cultural life in Russia. Being nine time zones away from the
financial centers creates a sense of isolation and liberation. For Russians,
Kamchatka is a land of dreams and possibilities, much as Alaska is the
last frontier for Americans. This gives one the sense that being in Kamchatka
is like being on the edge of the world. The majestic volcanoes, the continuous
seismicity and the incredible geology are omnipresent reminders that this
is a special place. The relentless subduction of the Pacific plate plunges
beneath Kamchatka, 70mm per year. Kamchatka is home to 29 active volcanoes,
and neighbor to the Bering strike-slip fault, marking the western end
of the Aleutian-Komandorsky Islands. This land mass provides an exceptional
platform for investigating the interactions of volcanism, tectonics, and
mantle dynamics.
We installed 15 broadband
PASSCAL instruments along the length of the Kamchatka Peninsula. Each
station included a Guralp 3T sensor, housed in an established short-period
seismic station or other existing structures to protect against the harsh
environment. Nearly all stations had backup power systems, including dry
cell batteries, solar panels and local, though intermittent, electricity
outlets. During the duration of this installation, Russia suffered significant
financial crises, which translated into erratic fuel supply to power stations
and considerable chaos in heating and power to individuals and institutions
alike. In spite of these
difficulties, we are
fortunate to announce at least an 80% return on the seismic signals for
most of the duration of the experiment. The high level of technical expertise
in the Russian Institutes was critical to the success of our experiment.
Description
of the SEKS Experiment
In this PASSCAL experiment
we address issues related to the transform-trench double junction in Kamchatka:
What are the implications for the crust and upper mantle? The surficial
manifestation of the connection is the massive Bering strike slip fault,
extending from Attu Island westward towards Kamchatka. In Kamchatka, the
margin between the Pacific Plate and North America takes a sharp turn
south, towards the Kurile trench and Japan. How does the Pacific plate
accommodate this sharp apparent bend? We have proposed a new model for
the northern extent of the subducting Pacific Plate and outline the implications
for flow in the upper mantle.
Plan view of
the SEKS array. The target was to straddle the intersection of the
Aleutian Arc (Bering Fault) with the Kamchatka Arc. GSN stations PET
and MA2 are shown in gold. |
There are two possibilities
to explain the Aleutian/Kamchatka connection. The first employs a laterally
continuous slab, the Pacific plate, which subducts uninterrupted below
both the Aleutians and Kamchatka. This model requires the Pacific Plate
north of Bering fault to move laterally through the mantle and bend around
the Kamchatka corner. It predicts the presence of a large body of cold
slab in the upper mantle, northwest of the Kamchatka/Bering intersection.
A second, alternative, model is that subduction in Kamchatka is parallel
to subduction in the Aleutians, and there is no connection between the
slab below the Bering Sea and the slab in the Kamchatka region. In this
model a tear between Kamchatka and the Aleutian subduction zones isolates
and separates these bodies. Furthermore, the upper mantle would be open
to flow through the tear beneath the Komandorsky Basin. It is primarily
the secondthe tear-modelthat we consider in this paper. The purpose of
our study is to test these alternative models.
The main surface observation
connecting the Aleutians and Kamchatka is a very long strike slip fault
that starts in the Aleutians and ends in central Kamchatka, slightly north
of the Kliuchevskoy group of volcanoes. The Bering fault is over 1,000
km long and has been studied in some detail by Russian and western researchers.
Nearly all earlier studies suggest that the Bering fault is strike slip,
with relatively shallow seismicity. The Bering fault separates the Komandorsky
part of the North American plate from the Pacific plate. Young Komandorsky
basin is juxtaposed against much older Pacific slab. The Komandorsky basin
contains an older spreading center, which ceased approximately 10 million
years ago. There is very high heat flow in the Komandorsky basin, as opposed
to heat flow in the adjacent Pacific slab. Gravity studies show that the
Komandorsky basin is relatively thin compared to the much thicker, older
Pacific plate.
Mantle
Dynamics
The implications for
a tear in the subducting Pacific plate are numerous and essential for
our understanding of mantle dynamics. In the past, researchers have primarily
concentrated on two-dimensional models of the flow in the mantle, where
slabs are typically represented as infinite planes in a half space. The
introduction of a tear, however, forces us to consider the three-dimensional
nature of flow in the mantle. What happens near the edge of the exposed
end of a subducting plate? How is flow near the edge modified by the more
complicated boundary conditions and how do these affect the very nature
of the slab itself? Our initial studies have focused on heating of slab
by conduction and convective ablation. The shallowing of the seismicity
in the northern part of the Kamchatka Arc suggests parts of the slab are
potentially missing or have thinned considerably.
Photo:
Jeff Johnson
Katrin Batereau
and Jonathan Lees install a station on the flanks of Klyuchevskoy
Volcano.
In the background
are extinct volcano Kamen and extremely active Bezymianni, the great
lateral blast volcano from 1956.
|
Anisotropy
If slab rollback and
trench-parallel asthenospheric flow are important, then a northward pattern
of mantle flow should be clearly apparent in observations of velocity
anisotropy. Initial results from studies of shear wave splitting in the
mantle below Kamchatka suggest that there observable trench parallel anisotropy
is small below the broadband array or offshore. Several observations in
our northernmost stations, however, show significant anisotropy trending
northwest-southeast, nearly parallel to the direction of the Pacific Plate.
These observations seem to agree with the model that mantle is straining
past the edge of the exposed slab north of the Aleutian-Kamchatka juncture.
Volcano
Geochemistry
Most melts
at volcanic arcs are formed in the mantle wedge, but experimental and
geochemical research has identified subduction zones where the crust of
the slab has apparently melted. Oceanic crust, however, is refractory
and much higher temperatures are required to melt it relative to the more
liable mantle. These crustal melts, or slab melts, were first described
in the Aleutians where they are now called adakites. Their distinctive
geochemical signature has been recognized in many places, including the
Kamchatka arc. Factors favoring slab melts include subduction of a young
(hot) plate, slow subduction allowing heating at shallow levels, and slab
edges where asthenospheric heating can produce sufficient
temperatures for crustal melting. Volcanoes above the Kamchatka corner
show evidence of slab melts. Seismic data provide an opportunity to study
the slab for evidence of hot spots where crustal melting might be occurring.
Photo: Jonathan Lees
Installation
at Zupanova, a station on the coast. A small shelter was used to
protect instrumentation from extreme weather conditions. Russian
M-8 helicopters were used for transportation to many of the stations
in the SEKS array.
|
Karymsky
Volcano
Opportunities for
exploring various aspects of geophysics abound in Kamchatka. During the
SEKS experiment, we were fortunate to witness the ongoing explosive activity
of Karymsky Volcano. Karymsky is located in a vast caldera complex, comparable
in size and activity to Long Valley Caldera in California. On January
1, 1996, a M7.0
earthquake triggered massive eruptions of Karymsky Volcano and nearby
Karymsky Lake. Since the initial eruptions, Karymsky has continuously
erupted in Strombolean mode, exploding every 5 to 15 minutes for nearly
4 years. The numerous, repetitive small explosions provide excellent multiplicity
of volcanic events, recorded annually by the members of the SEKS working
group and students. In addition, observations of infrasonic acoustic (Jeff
Johnson, University of Washington), COSPEC (Phil Kyle, New Mexico Inst.
Tech; Toby Fischer, Berkeley), gravity (Emily Brodsky, Caltech), GPS (Dan
Johnson, Central Washington University) and petrologic analyses (Alexei
Ozerov, Institute of Volcanology, RAS) are being combined to distinguish
models of conduit dynamics that control explosive activity. Our efforts
in Kamchatka thus span several orders of magnitude in scale, from mantle
to volcano conduit dynamics.
[click to enlarge]
Event recorded
on SEKS array on April 8, 1999, from a M6.4, 565 km depth earthquake
in southeast China. Several predicted phase arrival are shown for
reference. The data was filtered with a lowpass cutoff at 5 Hz.
Only vertical components are shown.
|
Conclusion
While the
challenges were daunting, we found the overall experience of working in
this remote part of the world rewarding and exhilarating. Initial inspection
of the data suggests we have a unique data set illuminating the subduction
zone, the volcanic front and the tectonic relations between the active
Kamchatka arc and the Bering-Aleutian transform.
|